answermethis.org.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the answermethis.org.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host answermethis.org.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is NetNames Operations Limited .

the related websites

zazzle.co.uk audible.co.uk amazon.co.uk urlm.co.uk store.musicmagpie.co.uk ilambretta.co.uk cafepress.co.uk audioboom.com ollymann.co.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

home carbon dioxide nitrous oxide & methane energy matters testimonies comment useful links :- icecap.us climate audit.org climate depot.com climate realists.com co2 science.org climate science international.org carbon sense.com friends of science.org global climate scam.com global warming policy foundation.org heartland.org i love carbon dioxide.com joanne nova.com.au petition project.org science and public policy.org watts up with that.com weather action.com last site update 27th october 2015 - 'oops! this wasn't supposed to happen' - see below. 'oops! this wasn't supposed to happen' a climate glasnost - the spectator 21 september 2013 next week, those who made dire predictions of ruinous climate change face their own inconvenient truth. the summary of the fifth assessment report by the intergovernmental panel on climate change (ipcc) will be published, showing that global temperatures are refusing to follow the path which was predicted for them by almost all climatic models. since its first report in 1990, the ipcc has been predicting that global temperatures would be rising at an average of 0.2 celsius per decade. now, the ipcc acknowledges that there has been no statistically significant rise at all over the past 16 years. it is difficult to over-emphasise the significance of this report. the ipcc is not simply a research body making reports and declarations which are merely absorbed into political debate. its word has been taken as gospel, and its research has been used to justify all manner of schemes to make carbon-based energy more expensive while subsidising renewable energy. the failure of its predictions undermines the certainties which have been placed upon the science of climate change. previous ipcc reports and much of the debate over how to react to them have appeared to treat the earth's climate as if it were a domestic central heating system, with carbon emissions analogous to the dial on the thermostat: a small tweak here will result in a temperature rise of precisely 0.2c and so on. what is clear from the new ipcc report is that the science is not nearly advanced enough to make useful predictions on the future rise of global temperatures. perhaps it never will be. some climate scientists themselves, to give them credit, have admitted as much. their papers now incorporate a degree of caution, as you would expect from genuine scientists. the problems arise when the non-scientists leap upon the climate change bandwagon and assume that anything marked 'science' must be the final word. as the chemist and novelist c. p. snow once warned in his lecture about the 'two cultures', you end up in a situation where non-scientists use half-understood reports to silence debate not realising that proper science welcomes refutation and is wary of the notion of absolute truths. and while we are constantly reminded that 'most scientists are agreed on climate change', it is remarkable how many of the most prominent figures warning of climatic armageddon are not themselves scientists. the chairman of the ipcc, rajendra pachauri, is a railway engineer. al gore, who shared a nobel prize with the ipcc for his film of climate change, an inconvenient truth, is a failed us presidential candidate. lord stern, whose 2006 report provoked the then environment secretary david miliband to say 'the science is settled', is an economist. few scientists would make such a claim. as lord lawson, former editor of this magazine, once pointed out, the time to be most fearful in politics is when a consensus emerges. it usually means that an argument is not properly probed, and desire to sign up to a fashionable cause supplants the proper rigour which policymaking requires. we certainly saw this with the climate change act, which committed future governments unilaterally to slashing britain's carbon emissions to a fifth of what they had been in 1990. the bill was passed in an atmosphere in which sceptics were likened to flat-earthers, with no one stopping to ask what it would achieve for the environment, and at what cost to britain. those were the days when gordon brown solemnly declared he had 50 days to save the world before the copenhagen climate change conference. the deadline passed and the world survived but our understanding of this complex planet has improved. and perhaps we are moving towards a 'climate glasnost'; a time in which, finally, the science can be debated rationally and we can study the decisions made in those days, and see that the climate change act was, in fact, a deeply irresponsible piece of legislation which will hit poor homeowners with huge energy bills at a time when other countries (especially the us) are following a policy of low energy prices. long before his 'two cultures' lecture, c. p. snow explained that science is a work in progress. the scientific mission is to take the best information available, 'take some pointer readings, make a mental construction from them in order to predict some more'. if the prediction turns out to be right, he said, 'the mental construction is, for the moment, a good one. if it is wrong, another mental construction has to be tried.' so it is with climate change science. there is not much doubt that the planet is warming, and man is at least partially responsible. but the failure of the old prediction models make it clear that there is not a simple relationship between carbon emissions and global warming. as things have worked out, carbon emissions in the rich world have been falling anyway not due to green taxes but to better technology, like fracking. global warming is still a monumental challenge, but one that does not necessarily have to be met by taxing the poor off the roads and out of the sky. sanity is returning to the environmental debate. let us hope that, before too long, it also returns to british energy policy. the images below says it all, so why are they not plastered all over the media? even if co2 was responsible for climate change, shutting down the uk's entire energy usage would make no difference whatsoever! are you listening mr. cameron? pigs might fly!! the next image shows just how little co2 there is in the atmosphere. look at it. think about it and answermethis - what is the carbon footprint alarmism all about? most of what needs to be said about the myth of man-made global warming/climate change has been said. unfortunately politicians are still in denial about the obvious fraud and continue to believe in agw regardless of the weight of the overwhelming scientific evidence continually showing that it just ain't so. as dr. richard lindzen, one of the worlds most respected climatologists and a massachusetts institute of technology professor of atmospheric science said :- future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st centurys developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age. further reports and updates are therefore not really worth making. so unless something major comes up, like the bbc admitting that they are talking a load of lefty-liberal-claptrap, then i will not update this site. tt - 12th december 2012. below is an interesting expose of the way science has been abused to promote the cause of catastrophic global warming. - 11th march 2013 nullius in verba - 'take no mans word for it.' the motto of the royal society in questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual. galileo galilei first they ignore you, then they mock you, then they fight you, then you win. mahatma ghandi the left doesnt much like to engage in rational, fact-based arguments as it knows its going to lose. thats why it is always so much more comfortable in the realm of the e

URL analysis for answermethis.org.uk

http://www.answermethis.org.uk//index.html
http://www.answermethis.org.uk//co2.htm
http://www.answermethis.org.uk//reality.htm
http://www.answermethis.org.uk//#top
http://www.answermethis.org.uk//n2o.htm
http://www.answermethis.org.uk//#stop_the_environment
http://www.answermethis.org.uk//solar.htm
http://www.answermethis.org.uk//energy.htm
http://www.answermethis.org.uk//comment.htm

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
answermethis.org.uk

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 10-Dec-2012

Registrar:
Easily Limited t/a easily.co.uk [Tag = WEBCONSULTANCY]
URL: http://www.easily.co.uk

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 10-Feb-2006
Expiry date: 10-Feb-2023
Last updated: 22-Feb-2018

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ns1.meganameservers.eu
ns2.meganameservers.eu
ns3.meganameservers.eu

WHOIS lookup made at 20:15:08 15-Jun-2018

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS answermethis.org.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

SPONSOR
Easily Limited t/a easily.co.uk [Tag = WEBCONSULTANCY]
URL: http://www.easily.co.uk
Relevant dates:

  CREATED 10-Feb-2006

  CHANGED 22-Feb-2018

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  NS1.MEGANAMESERVERS.EU 91.136.8.241

  NS2.MEGANAMESERVERS.EU 91.136.7.21

  NS3.MEGANAMESERVERS.EU 66.175.41.102

  NAME answermethis.org.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .